STEVEN MEHLER, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA KEYS ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATES, INC., APPELLEE
STEVEN MEHLER, APPELLANT,
FLORIDA KEYS ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATES, INC., APPELLEE
576 So. 2d 1355
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff Steven Mehler from a final judgment entered upon an adverse jury verdict in a negligence action arising out of a sailboat accident. We affirm.
The trial court did not, as urged, commit reversible error in excluding evidence of post-accident remedial changes at the accident scene. Such evidence was clearly inadmissible as a general rule, Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Rosania, 546 So. 2d 736, 738 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); § 90.407, Fla.Stat. (1987), and did not, as urged, qualify for admission in this case under any exception thereto. See, e.g., C. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 407.1 (2d ed. 1984). The remaining point has no merit.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Blanton A. Harris v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 700 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)…ont, 455 So. 2d 1026 (Fla.1984); City of Miami Beach v. Wolfe, 83 So. 2d 774 (Fla.1955); Walt Disney World Co. v. Blalock, 640 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. 5th DCA), review dismissed, 649 So. 2d 232 (Fla.1994); Mehler v. Florida Keys Elec. Coop. Assocs., Inc., 576 So. 2d 1355 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Rosania, 546 So. 2d 736 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Further, contrary to the plaintiffs assertion, this evi [*1242] dence does not fall into any of the exceptions that would allow it to be admitted into evi…
Authorities Cited
- Dubow v. Richards, 546 So. 2d 736 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
- Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Rosania, 546 So. 2d 736 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)