TERRENCE JOSEPH DOLAN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1991-03-12
No. 90-174
Before COPE, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.
576 So. 2d 811 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1991)


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Terrence Dolan appeals his convictions for trafficking in cocaine and resisting arrest without violence. As to defendant’s first point on appeal, we conclude that the codefendant’s testimony cannot reasonably be construed as an impermissible reference to a polygraph examination. Second, no reversible error has been shown with respect to the trial court’s ruling regarding the two television programs which aired during the course of the trial. See Alfonso v. State, 443 So. 2d 176, 177 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). The programs did not relate to the instant case, no request was made to poll the jury, and no showing was made which would raise any serious question of possible prejudice to the defendant. See id.; Robinson v. State, 438 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied, 438 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 1983); see also United States v. Goodman, 605 F. 2d 870, 882 (5th Cir.1979).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw