CHARLES E. ALEXANDER, ET AL., APPELLANTS,

v.

ELSA SAMAYOA LARA, ET AL., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Morales v. State, 580 So. 2d 788 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
  …after the sentencing hearing] applies prospectively only to sentences imposed after the effective date of Ree, to wit: July 19, 1990. State v. Lyles, 576 So. 2d 706 (Fla.1991); State v. Williams, 576 So. 2d 281 (Fla.1991); see also State v. Greene, 575 So. 2d 787 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). The sentence in the instant case was imposed on April 23, 1986, and, accordingly, under Lyles and Williams, Ree has no application to this case; we had previously thought that Ree could be applied to a so-called “pipe-line” case,…
• State v. Fields, 602 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
  …bility that such treatment will be successful. Expert testimony on the subject would be helpful but is not mandatory where there is other evidence to support the conclusion. Herrin v. State, 568 So. 2d 920, 922 (Fla.1990); see also State v. Greene, 575 So. 2d 787 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). In the present case there is no such record evidence. The court ordered an evaluation of defendant to be performed after sentencing, but did not have the benefit of that evaluation at sentencing. Further, there are no other fact…

Authorities Cited

• L.K. v. Water's Edge Ass'n, 532 So. 2d 1097 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)