C.J., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida appellate court affirmed a juvenile delinquency adjudication for cocaine possession, holding that the trial court properly denied the motion to suppress because the defendant voluntarily abandoned the cocaine before any police seizure or unlawful search occurred.
A voluntary abandonment of cocaine by a defendant prior to any police seizure or unlawful search does not violate Fourth Amendment rights, and evidence of such abandonment is admissible.
[1] A defendant's voluntary abandonment of contraband prior to any police seizure or unlawful search is not tainted by police conduct and does not implicate Fourth Amendment…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“neither officer gave any order to the respondent prior to the discard of the plastic bag of cocaine; indeed, this was the precise testimony of officer Rickey Rivero.”
Establishing that the cocaine was voluntarily abandoned without police command or coercion.
C.J., a juvenile, was approached by two police officers in an apartment building stairwell and dropped a plastic bag of cocaine to the ground without …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Voluntary Abandonment cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the final judgment of delinquency and disposition thereon for unlawful possession of cocaine based on a holding that the trial court properly denied the respondent C.J.’s motion to suppress. Although the evidence below is somewhat in conflict, the trial court was privileged to find that (1) the respondent dropped a plastic bag of cocaine to the ground as two police officers approached the respondent and his companion in the outside stairwell of an apartment building, and (2) neither officer gave any order to the respondent prior to the discard of the plastic bag of cocaine; indeed, this was the precise testimony of officer Rickey Rivero. McNamara v. State, 357 So. 2d 410, 412 (Fla.1978); State v. Butler, 520 So. 2d 325, 326 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).
This being so, it is plain that no police seizure of the respondent was effected prior to the discard of the subject cocaine, see Michigan v. Chesternut, 486 U.S. 567, 108 S.Ct. 1975, 100 L.Ed.2d 565 (1988); that the said discard was a voluntary abandonment of a property which was in no way tainted by any prior illegal police conduct, much less a prior illegal search of the defendant which is required in order for the subject abandonment to be tainted, see State v. Oliver, 368 So. 2d 1331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. dismissed, 383 So. 2d 1200 (Fla.1980); and that, accordingly, the police seizure of the voluntarily abandoned cocaine prior to any arrest or seizure of the respondent did not invade the respondent's reasonable expectation of privacy and therefore did not violate, as urged, the respondent’s Fourth Amendment rights.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- McNAMARA v. State, 357 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 1978)
- Michigan v. Chesternut, 486 U.S. 567 (U.S. 1988)
- Mitchell v. Budd, 350 U.S. 473 (U.S. 1956)
- State v. Oliver, 368 So. 2d 1331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- State v. Butler, 520 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)