B.S., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that while the evidence was insufficient to prove intent to sell cocaine, it was sufficient to prove simple possession of cocaine.
A juvenile, B.S., was adjudicated delinquent for possession of cocaine with intent to sell. The State conceded insufficient evidence for the intent to…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Possession Of Cocaine With Intent To Sell cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, B.S., a juvenile, appeals an order withholding adjudication of delinquency and placing appellant on community control for possession of cocaine with intent to sell. Appellant’s sole contention on appeal is that the appellee, the State, presented insufficient evidence to establish appellant’s intent to sell cocaine.
The State concedes that the evidence adduced at the adjudicatory hearing was insufficient to support the charge of possession of cocaine with intent to sell. The State argues, however, and the appellant agrees, that there was sufficient evidence to find against appellant for possession of cocaine.
Based upon the State s and appellant s concessions, and our review of the record, we reverse insofar as the trial court found that appellant possessed cocaine with intent to sell, but affirm the order on the ground that appellant had committed the offense of possession of cocaine. C.L.L. v. State, 566 So. 2d 878 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); McCullough v. State, 541 So. 2d 720 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Worth Moses McCULLOUGH v. State, 541 So. 2d 720 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
- C.L.L. v. State, 566 So. 2d 878 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)