VICTORIA BLAIR, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
VICTORIA BLAIR, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
571 So. 2d 594
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We strike the special condition of probation that prohibited appellant from driving during the term of probation. The condition has no reasonable relationship to appellant’s rehabilitation. See Rodriquez v. State, 378 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). The judgment and order of probation is otherwise affirmed.
SCHOONOVER, C.J., and CAMPBELL and FRANK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Correa v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n for Bacf 2006-D, 118 So. 3d 952 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)…(“[U]pon remand, Nationwide should not be given a second bite at the apple to present evidence which it failed to produce at the scheduled eviden-tiary hearing.”); State ex rel. City of Naples v. Cooper (In re Forfeiture of 1987 Chevrolet Corvette), 571 So. 2d 594, 596 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) (holding that a forfeiture defendant failed to meet his burden of rebutting the sheriffs probable cause showing and declining to afford the defendant “a second bite at the apple by way of a new hearing”); Teca, Inc. v. WM-TAB…
-
Carlough v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 609 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)…ttorney’s fees. Under the cir [*772] cumstances, upon remand, Nationwide should not be given a second bite at the apple to present evidence which it failed to produce at the scheduled evidentiary hearing. See In re Forfeiture of 1987 Chev. Corvette, 571 So. 2d 594 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). “Somewhere the curtain must ring down on litigation.” Broward County v. Coe, 376 So. 2d 1222, 1223 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). Reversed and remanded with directions to the trial court to grant Carlough’s motion for attorney’s fees in a…
-
Edwards v. State, 351 So. 3d 1142 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022)…easonable doubt. See Edwards v. State, 257 So. 3d 586, 588 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018). Preponderance of evidence requires a greater weight of the evidence or “more than a fifty percent likelihood of guilt.” See In re Forfeiture of 1987 Chevrolet Corvette, 571 So. 2d 594, 595 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). And proof beyond a reasonable doubt requires “an abiding conviction of guilt.” Fla. Std. Jury Instr. (Crim.) 3.7. It is hard to pinpoint exactly where on the spectrum between the other two standards of proof clear and convin…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Rodriguez v. State, 378 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)