REED FRAZIER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Probation Conditions cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The appellant, Reed Frazier, challenges the trial court’s revocation of his probation for failure to comply with the terms and conditions of that probation. We find that the state presented sufficient, competent evidence to support its allegations that the appellant violated three conditions of his probation. We, accordingly, affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation and the subsequent sentence imposed upon him.
We must, however, remand this matter to the trial court for the entry of a proper conviction order. In order to properly revoke a defendant’s probation, the trial court must enter a written order specifying the terms and conditions of probation that have been violated. Clark v. State, 510 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). The trial court failed to do so in this case. We, therefore, affirm the revocation of probation and the subsequent sentence, but remand for the entry of an amended written order specifying the conditions of probation which the trial court found that the appellant violated. The appellant does not have to be present.
SCHOONOVER, C.J., and RYDER and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jones v. State, 638 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)…iled to file a written order revoking Appellant’s probation. The trial court must enter a written order specifying the terms and conditions of probation that have been violated. Robinson v. State, 609 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Frazier v. State, 571 So. 2d 593 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). Accordingly, this case is remanded for the entry of a written order of revocation that specifies the particular probation conditions that were violated. The Appellant does not have to be present. See Frazier v. State, 571 So. 2…
-
Mack v. State, 694 So. 2d 130 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)…la. 1st DCA 1997); Sanchez v. State, 675 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Vezina v. State, 667 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Jones v. State, 638 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Robinson v. State, 609 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Frazier v. State, 571 So. 2d 593 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Clark v. State, 510 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). The appellant need not be present for this clerical correction. Bontrager v. State, 678 So. 2d 518 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). AFFIRMED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS. PETERSON, C.…
-
Wilson v. State, 581 So. 2d 255 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)…en revocation order. As the parties [*256] agree, a written order reciting the specific violations is required by Knight v. State, 566 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) and Clark v. State, 510 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). See also, Frazier v. State, 571 So. 2d 593 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We decline to speculate as to the court’s resolution of the various factual issues presented, and because it is not clear whether the court would have revoked the appellant’s probation and imposed the same sentence upon proper fi…
Authorities Cited
- Clark v. State, 510 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)