EUGENE CHANQUET, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Offenses cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. State v. McGriff, 537 So. 2d 107 (Fla.1989); State v. Jones, 530 So. 2d 53 (Fla.1988); Williams v. State, 504 So. 2d 392 (Fla.1987); State v. Sheperd, 479 So. 2d 106 (Fla. 1985); § 921.001(5), Fla.Stat. (1987).
The trial court placed Chanquet on community control for committing two burglaries; two months later, the trial court revoked community control and sentenced Chanquet to one year and one day in jail because he committed another substantive crime. Four months after his release, Chanquet committed the crimes for which the trial court imposed three consecutive life sentences.
We affirmed. Page 962. In his motion for rehearing, Chanquet argues that the record does not reflect why the trial court had revoked community control: he is correct, although the scoresheet contains a note that Chanquet had previously been convicted of a third degree felony. Marion v. State, 559 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), dictates that to depart from the sentencing guidelines on the basis of a continuing pattern of criminal activity, the trial court must make specific findings as to the timing of each of Chanquet’s four felonies, and the violation of community control, as well as the temporal proximity to the release from jail of the commission of the offenses for which he was convicted. Under State v. Jones, 530 So. 2d 53 (Fla. 1988), mere temporal proximity, without more, is insufficient to sustain a departure sentence.
Thus, we must vacate Chan-quet’s sentences.
Finding that the trial court failed to demonstrate a pattern of continuing behavior justifying departure from the guidelines sentence, we grant rehearing, reverse, and remand for resentencing within the guidelines.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Chanquet v. State, 646 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)…the trial court entered departure sentences of life imprisonment. On direct appeal the convictions were affirmed, but the departure sentences were vacated and the cause remanded for resen-tencing within the sentencing guidelines. Chanquet v. State, 570 So. 2d 962 (Fla. Bd DCA 1990), opinion superseded on rehearing, 586 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). On remand defendant was sentenced to concurrent terms of 27 years for each of the three felonies.1 was convicted of In 1994 defendant filed his motion to correc…
-
Chanquet v. State, 586 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…t to one year and one day in jail because he committed another substantive [*500] crime. Four months after his release, Chanquet committed the crimes for which the trial court imposed three consecutive life sentences. We affirmed. Chanquet v. State, 570 So. 2d 962 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). In his motion for rehearing, Chanquet argues that the record does not reflect why the trial court had revoked community control: he is correct, although the scoresheet contains a note that Chanquet had previously been convicted o…
-
Lipscomb v. State, 573 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)…proximity” to a "continuing and persistent pattern of criminal activity." See also Jones v. State (Jones II) 553 So. 2d 702 (Fla.1989); Gibson v. State, 553 So. 2d 701 (Fla.1989); Marion v. State, 559 So. 2d 389 (FIa.3d DCA 1990); Chanquet v. State, 570 So. 2d 962, 963 (Fla.3d DCA 1990) (on rehearing). But see, Barfield v. State, 564 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (question certified). . State v. Jones, 530 So. 2d 53 (Fla. 1988), and other cases relating to analogous situations, appear to require that the tr…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Williams v. State, 504 So. 2d 392 (Fla. 1987)
- State v. Cledius Orlando Jones, 530 So. 2d 53 (Fla. 1988)
- State v. McGRIFF, 537 So. 2d 107 (Fla. 1989)
- State v. Sheperd, 479 So. 2d 106 (Fla. 1985)
- In the Interest of: L.R. v. State, 559 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)