MANUEL LASTRA, ET AL.
v.
UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A complaint for insurance coverage for hurricane damage must be dismissed when the plaintiff fails to comply with the pre-suit notice provisions of section 627.70152(3)(a), Florida Statutes.
[1] Failure to comply with the pre-suit notice provisions of section 627.70152(3)(a), Florida Statutes, warrants dismissal of an insurance claim for property damage.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceManuel and Aida Lastra filed a claim against their insurer, Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company, for damage to their home caused by Hurric…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed April 15, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D25-0257 Lower Tribunal No. 22-3394-CA-01
Manuel Lastra, et al., Appellants,
VS.
Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mavel Ruiz, Judge.
Alvarez, Feltman, Da Silva & Costa, P.L., and Paul B. Feltman, for appellants.
Hicks, Porter & Stein, P.A., and Dinah S. Stein and Lindsey A. Hicks, for appellee.
Before SCALES, C.J., and LINDSEY, and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Appellants, Plaintiffs below, Manuel and Aida Lastra, filed a claim for damage to their home allegedly caused by Hurricane Irma. Their insurer, Universal Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“Universal”), moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to comply with the pre-suit provisions of section 627.70152(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2025). Bound by this Court's decision in Cantens v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, 388 So. 3d 242 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024), we hold that the trial court committed no reversible error in dismissing Manuel and Aida Lastra's claim under the statute.1 Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Hughes v. Universal Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 374 So.3d 900 (Fla. 6th DCA 2023)