MATTHEW VISELLI
v.
DHSMV
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Ninth Judicial Circuit Court granted a petition for writ of certiorari challenging the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles' suspension of a driver's license for driving with an unlawful breath alcohol level. The court found that the hearing officer violated the petitioner's due process rights by refusing to issue a subpoena for the arresting officer, who was identified in documents submitted to the Department, and quashed the suspension order with remand for further proceedings.
The hearing officer violated the petitioner's due process rights by failing to issue the subpoena for Officer Osorno, as the hearing officer was required to do so under Florida Statutes section 322.2615(6)(b), which authorizes issuance of subpoenas for officers and witnesses identified in documents provided pursuant to section 322.2615(2)(a).
[1] A hearing officer in an administrative license suspension proceeding must issue subpoenas for officers identified in documents submitted to the agency when required by st…
[2] Denial of a subpoena for an arresting officer in an administrative license suspension hearing violates due process.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The duty of the circuit court on a certiorari review of an administrative agency is limited to three components: Whether procedural due process was followed, whether there was a departure from the essential requirements of law, and whether the administrative findings and judgment were supported by competent substantial evidence.”
Establishes the standard of review for certiorari challenges to administrative agency decisions
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceOn August 20, 2013, Matthew Viselli was arrested for driving under the influence after providing breath test results of 0.204 and 0.197. His driver's …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Administrative Agency Review cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
FINAL ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Petitioner, Matthew Viselli (“Viselli”) seeks certiorari review of the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles’ (“Department or “Respondent”) final order sustaining the suspension of his driver license for driving with an unlawful breath alcohol level. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to section 322.2615(13), Florida Statutes and Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(c)(3). 2 of 4 On August 20, 2013, Viselli was arrested for driving under the influence. Viselli provided breath test results of 0.204 and 0.197 and his license was suspended. He requested a formal review hearing pursuant to section 322.2615.
On August 30, 2013, Viselli’s counsel requested subpoenas, one of which was for the arresting officer Edgard Osorno who completed the arrest affidavit entered into evidence at the hearing as DDL#3. The Department refused to issue the subpoena for Officer Osorno.
At the hearing held on September 16, 2013, Viselli’s counsel moved to invalidate the suspension and argued that the hearing officer’s failure to issue the subpoena for Officer Osorno deprived him of due process and the Department’s exhibits should be stricken from the record and not considered. The hearing officer denied counsel’s objections and on September 23, 2013, entered a written order sustaining Viselli’s license suspension. “The duty of the circuit court on a certiorari review of an administrative agency is limited to three components: Whether procedural due process was followed, whether there was a departure from the essential requirements of law, and whether the administrative findings and judgment were supported by competent substantial evidence.” Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Satter, 643 So. 2d 692, 695 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
In the Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Viselli argues that he was denied due process when the hearing officer refused to issue the subpoena for the arresting officer, Edgard Osorno, identified in the Department’s exhibits DDL#1, DDL#3, and DDL#4 that were entered into evidence. The Department concedes that Viselli’s due process rights were violated when the hearing officer failed to issue the subpoena for the arresting officer.
Pursuant to section 322.2615(6)(b) of the Florida Statutes, the hearing officer is authorized to issue subpoenas for officers and witnesses identified in documents provided in 3 of 4 section 322.2615(2)(a). §322.2615(6)(b), Fla. Stat. (2013); Fla. Admin. Code R. 15A-6.012(1); Klinker v. Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 118 So. 3d 835 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013), review denied, 123 So. 3d 558 (Fla. 2013). The arresting officer, Edgard Osorno, prepared the arrest affidavit and is identified in the documents submitted to the Department pursuant to section 322.2615(2)(a).
Therefore, the hearing officer was required to issue the subpoena for Officer Osorno and violated Viselli’s due process rights by failing to do so.
In light of this conclusion, the Court finds it unnecessary to address Viselli’s other arguments. Viselli requests that the Court order the Department to delete the suspension of his license from its records.
However on certiorari review, the Court is limited to denying the petition or quashing the order on review. Broward County v. G.B.V. Intern., Ltd., 787 So. 2d 838, 844 (Fla. 2001). The reviewing Court cannot direct the lower tribunal to enter any particular order or judgment. Id. Based on the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is GRANTED; the Final Order of License Suspension is QUASHED; and this matter is REMANDED for further proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Orlando, Orange County, Florida, this 9th day of December , 2013.
/S/____________________________ MARC L. LUBET Presiding Circuit Judge
G. ADAMS and MIHOK, J.J., concur. 4 of 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. mail/ email to: Matthew P. Ferry, Esq., mattwarrenlindseylaw.com, Law Office of Warren W. Lindsey, P.A., P.O. Box 505, Winter Park, Florida 32790, Florida 32803; Kimberly A. Gibbs, Assistant General Counsel, [email protected], Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, P.O. Box 570066, Orlando, Florida 32857 on this 10th day of December, 2013.
/S/___________________________
Judicial Assistant
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Broward Cnty. v. G.B.V. Int'l, Ltd., 787 So. 2d 838 (Fla. 2001)
- Dep't of Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Satter, 643 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)
- Klinker v. Dep't of Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles, 118 So. 3d 835 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013)