M.,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the lower court's decision without providing specific reasoning in this excerpt.
This case involves an appeal concerning a child identified as L.L. The appellant is A.M., and the appellees are the Department of Children and Familie…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Parental Rights cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
In the Interest of L.L., a child
A.M. Appellant,
v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM,
Appellees.
No. 2D2025-3348
March 25, 2026
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Richard H. Martin, Judge.
David A. Dee, Tampa, for Appellant.
Mary Soorus of Children's Legal Services, Tampa, for Appellee Department of Children and Families.
Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb and Sarah Todd Weitz of Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Appellee Guardian ad Litem Program Office.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT, VILLANTI, and SLEET, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
2