MAY

v.

TURNER GROVES LTD. PARTNERSHIP

Citator

Cited By

• Markland v. State, 971 So. 2d 832 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)
  …evive a claim which has already been found to be time-barred under Peart. Second, the trial court also stated that the claim was without merit and denied relief on authority of Saint-Fleur v. State, 840 So. 2d 261 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), review denied, 906 So. 2d 1059 (Fla.2005). In that case our court said: [Wjhere a defendant enters a plea in exchange for a sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole ... it is implausible to say that the possibility of deportation would have stopped the def…
• Santiago v. State, 88 So. 3d 1020 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)
  …Mandate issued July 3, 2003. Mr. Santiago filed this postconviction motion on September 5, 2006. It is timely because he sought review of this court’s opinion by the Florida Supreme Court, which denied review on June 8, 2005, see Santiago v. State, 906 So. 2d 1059 (Fla.2005) (table decision), and he then sought review by the United States Supreme Court, which denied his petition on October 31, 2005, see Santiago v. Florida, 546 U.S. 987, 126 S.Ct. 572, 163 L.Ed.2d 479 (2005). See Davis v. State, 953 So. 2d 61…
• Sipple v. State, 972 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)
  …ed as to the law thereon, because it is the jury’s function to determine that issue. Id. at 104 (quoting Kilgore v. State, 271 So. 2d 148, 152 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972)); see also Sundberg v. State, 888 So. 2d 87, 88-89 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), review denied, 906 So. 2d 1059 (Fla.2005). In order to establish a prima facie case of self-defense, the defendant does not have to testify at trial; his or her statement to the police admitted into evidence may be sufficient. See Peterka v. State, 890 So. 2d 219, 229 (Fla.2004)…