WENDT

v.

LA COSTA BEACH RESORT CONDOMINIUM ASS'N, INC.

Citator

Cited By

• Kimon Black v. State, 59 So. 3d 340 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
  …e very different legal reasons to resolve the case, none of which had majority support. Because of the fractured nature of the Serrano opinion, the Florida Supreme Court found that it was unable to review the holding on appeal. See Serrano v. State, 26 So. 3d 582 (Fla.2010) ("[T]he Court has determined that it lacks jurisdiction in this case because there is no majority decision on the merits.”). As such, we do not certify Serrano as being in conflict with our holding here. . “The right to counsel establish…
• Wooden v. State, 42 So. 3d 837 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)
  …’s sentence. Wooden does not need to be present for such proceeding. REVERSED and REMANDED. ORFINGER and TORPY JJ., concur. . Contrary to the State's argument, our decision in Mendenhall v. State, 999 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008), rev. granted, 26 So. 3d 582 (Fla.2009) does not suggest a different result. In Mendenhall, we approved the imposition of a thirty-five year sentence on a first degree felony where the trial court also imposed a thirty-five year minimum mandatory sentence pursuant to section 77…
• Newton W. McLEOD v. State, 52 So. 3d 784 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)
  …on 775.087(2)(a)(3) does not create a new statutory maximum penalty of life imprisonment. Id. In a footnote, we further stated: Contrary to the State’s argument, our decision in Mendenhall v. State, 999 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008), rev. granted 26 So. 3d 582 (Fla.2009) does not suggest a different result. In Menden-hall, we approved the imposition of a thirty-five year sentence on a first degree felony where the trial court also imposed a thirty-five year minimum mandatory sentence pursuant to section 7…