MCCONVILLE
v.
FORT PIERCE BANK & TRUST CO.
MCCONVILLE
FORT PIERCE BANK & TRUST CO.
101 Fla. 727
Florida Supreme Court (1931)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 135 So. 392
Cited by 58 cases
Opinion of the Court
Paul B. McConville, Plaintiff in Error v. Fort Pierce Bank & Trust Company, a corporation, Defendant in Error. Opinion filed May 29, 1931. Alto Adams, for Plaintiff in Error; F. L. Hemmvngs, for Defendant in Error.
Per Curiam. The record in this cause having been considered by the Court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 14553, Acts of 1929, adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the judgment of the court below be, and the same is hereby, affirmed. Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (15 total)
-
State v. LEE, 356 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 1978)…ct, unrelated and incongruous subjects are embodied in the title itself, it matters little that pro [*289] visions in the body of the Act are germane to one or more of the stated subjects in the title. Cf. McConville v. Fort Pierce Bank & Trust Co., 101 Fla. 727, 135 So. 392 (1931). The title should express only one subject. Colonial Inv. Co. v. Nolan, supra. The constitutional provision is mandatory. Boyer v. Black, 154 Fla. 723, 18 So. 2d 886 (1944). Although courts are naturally reluctant to invalidate…
-
Dep't OF Educ. v. Lewis, 416 So. 2d 455 (Fla. 1982)…yant, 178 So. 2d 2 (Fla.1965); Lee v. Bigby Electric Co., 136 Fla. 305, 186 So. 505 (1939); State ex rel. Grodin v. Barns, 119 Fla. 405, 161 So. 568 (1935); Ex parte Sarros, 116 Fla. 86, 156 So. 396 (1934); McConville v. Ft. Pierce Bank & Trust Co., 101 Fla. 727, 135 So. 392 (1931); Colonial Investment Co. v. Nolan, 100 Fla. 1349, 131 So. 178 (1930); State ex rel. Crump v. Sullivan, 99 Fla. 1070, 128 So. 478 (1930). Through a number of cases decided over many years this Court has attempted to make clear to…
-
Mahood v. Bessemer Props. Inc., 154 Fla. 710 (Fla. 1944)…68 U.S. 90, 18 S. Ct. 38, 42 L. Ed. 392. The objection to the title to the Act must fail because the Act has been reenacted into the gerenal revision. See Chapter 22000, Acts of 1943 and McConville v. Fort Pierce Bank & Trust Company, 101 Fla. 727, 135 So. 392.…
Previewing 3 of 15 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence