THE STATE OF FLORIDA EX REL., WILLIAM H. ADAMS, RELATOR
v.
R. M. CALL, CIRCUIT JUDGE, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
In this original mandamus proceeding, the Florida Supreme Court addresses whether a circuit judge is disqualified from hearing a case involving the dedication of corporate property when the judge was a stockholder in the corporation at the time of the alleged dedication. The Court holds that the judge is indeed disqualified due to his pecuniary interest in the outcome.
A judge who was a stockholder when a corporation allegedly dedicated property to public use is disqualified from judicially determining the legal effect of that dedication. The judge has a direct pecuniary interest in the outcome because stockholders are the real owners of corporate property and have a present pecuniary interest in any property dedicated to public use.
“The stockholders of a corporation are the real owners of its corporate property, and every stockholder has a present pecuniary interest in property of the corporation that is dedicated to public use.”
Establishes the basis for finding a disqualifying interest—stockholders' ownership stake in corporate property
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceBefore his appointment as judge, R. M. Call was a stockholder in the Jacksonville and Atlantic Railroad Company. While Call held stock, certain lands …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Judicial Disqualification cases and more on FLexlaw
Whitfield, C. J.
This is an original proceeding in mandamus to determine whether the Judge of the Fourth Judicial Circuit is disqualified to hear and decide a cause pending in the court over which he presides.
It appears that before his appointment as judge the Honorable Rhydon M. Call was a stockholder in the Jacksonville and Atlantic Railroad Company, a corporation, and it is alleged that while he was a stockholder certain lands of the corporation were dedicated to public use. It does not appear that the respondent has disposed of his stock, but it does appear that all the property of the corporation was sold and transferred by judicial decree. In a suit now pending in the Fourth Judicial Circuit the alleged dedication is being litigated, and the judge has made an order therein stating his disqualification to hear and determine the cause “on account of interest in the result thereof.” The stockholders of a corporation are the real owners of its corporate property, and every stockholder has a present pecuniary interest in property of the corporation that is dedicated to public use. When the legal effect of a dedication by a corporation is litigated, any person who was a stockholder when the dedication was made is disqualified to determine judicially the legal effect of the dedication. Judge Call, as a stockholder of the corporation, had a direct pecuniary interest in the alleged dedication of property of the corporation, and when that dedication is being litigated he is disqualified to act therein judicially. He cannot judicially determine the legal effect of a dedication in which he. as a stockholder of the corporation participated through the directors or other agents of the corporation in making the alleged dedication.
The alternative writ is quashed.
All concur, except Taylor, J., absent on account of illness.