EDWIN JACKSON MCGINNIS AND RETHA PAULK MCGINNIS, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AND EDWIN JACKSON MCGINNIS, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ANTHONY EDWIN MCGINNIS, APPELLANTS,
v.
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A dissenting opinion argues that an aircraft should not be forfeited because the amended complaint failed to allege that the parties in interest acted with any intent or guilty knowledge, which is required by statute.
The dissenting judge would reverse the forfeiture because the statutory provisions require an allegation and proof of guilty knowledge or intent, which was absent from the complaint.
An amended complaint alleged an aircraft had false French registration numbers and was not registered with the FAA. The owner was identified, but the …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. Valiant Ins. Co. v. Webster, 567 So. 2d 408 (Fla.1990); MacKoul v. Fidelity and Casualty Co., 402 So. 2d 1259 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), rev. denied, 412 So. 2d 467 (Fla.1982); and Skroh v. Travelers Ins. Co., 227 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969).
WENTWORTH, MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Leonardi v. State, 567 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 1990)
- Valiant Ins. Co. v. Webster, 567 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 1990)
- Riley W. MacKoul v. The Fid. & Cas. Co. OF NEW York, 402 So. 2d 1259 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)
- Skroh v. The Travelers Ins. Co., 227 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969)