VELPO HOGG
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
In this consolidated Anders appeal, the Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's revocation of sex offender probation and resulting sentence in one case, but vacated the probation revocation order in another case where the trial court found the violation had not been proven by the State.
The trial court properly revoked probation and imposed sentence in case 2012-033862-CFAES, but improperly entered a revocation order in case 2013-303091-CFDB where it found the violation had not been proven by the State.
“the trial court found that the sole violation of probation alleged in this case had not been proven by the State”
Establishes the factual basis for vacating the probation revocation order in case 2013-303091-CFDB
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellant Velpo Hogg was subject to sex offender probation in two separate circuit court cases (2012-033862-CFAES and 2013-303091-CFDB). In the first …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders V. California Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Case Nos. 5D2024-2613 5D2024-2446 LT Case Nos. 2013-303091-CFDB 2012-033862-CFAES
VELPO HOGG,
Appellant,
v. STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County. Leah R. Case, Judge.
Michael C. Nappi, Chief Assistant Regional Counsel, Casselberry, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Caldwell, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
March 21, 2025
PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated appeals proceeding under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we affirm, without further discussion, the trial court's order revoking sex offender probation and the resulting judgment and sentence imposed upon Appellant in circuit court case number 2012-033862-CFAES after a violation of probation non-jury trial.
However, we vacate the order revoking probation entered in circuit court case number 2013-303091-CFDB after the same trial because the trial court found that the sole violation of probation alleged in this case had not been proven by the State, as further evidenced by the court having not thereafter imposed judgment and sentence.
AFFIRMED as to circuit court case number 2012-033862-CFAES; ORDER VACATED in circuit court case number 2013-303091-CFDB.
WALLIS, LAMBERT, and SOUD, JJ., concur. Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
2