LYN-RAND METAL FABRICATIONS CO., INC., APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,

v.

AMERICAN ACCESSORIES CORPORATION, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT

Citator

Cited By

• Linn v. State, 921 So. 2d 830 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
  …state is not required to rebut conclusively every possible variation of events which could be inferred from the evidence, but only to introduce competent evidence which is inconsistent with the defendant’s theory of events.” See also Perez v. State, 565 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). The evidence for the jury to consider included: (1) Linn testified he purchased CV joints from Discount Auto, yet Linn had no receipt for the purchase or store employee to confirm such purchase; (2) Linn testified he purchased…
• Thompson v. State, 640 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
  …all reasonable hypotheses of innocence. We find sufficient evidence on the record to contradict the defendant’s theory of innocence and to support the denial of her motion of acquittal. See Taylor v. State, 583 So. 2d 323 (Fla.1991); Perez v. State, 565 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), rev. denied, 576 So. 2d 290 (Fla.1991). The defendant also contends that she was denied a fair trial by ineffective assistance of counsel. The defendant asserts that the facts giving rise to her claim are apparent on the record…
• Basulto-Rodriguez v. State, 95 So. 3d 403 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)
  …If the State introduces such evidence, then the jury must decide whether the evidence is sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence beyond a reasonable doubt. See Davis v. State, 90 So. 2d 629, 631-32 (Fla.1956); Perez v. State, 565 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). The standard for review of a denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal is not whether in the opinion of the trial judge or of the appellate court the evidence fails to exclude every reasonable hypothesis other than guilt, but…