CITY OF PLANT CITY AND AUTO-OWNERS INS. CO., APPELLANTS,
v.
SHELBY BELCHER AND FIRST SOUTHERN INSURANCE, APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 1990-07-16
No. 89-2018
ERVIN and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
564 So. 2d 562 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1990)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed a workers' compensation order awarding temporary and permanent total disability benefits to an employee injured while working as a gardener and grave digger. The court rejected the employer/carrier's challenges to both the finding that an accident occurred and the JCC's determination that the accident date was August 19, 1987, rather than August 26, 1987 as originally claimed.


Holding

The court affirmed the JCC's finding that an accident resulting in permanent injury occurred and that the date of accident was August 19, 1987. The court concluded that competent substantial evidence supported the accident finding and that neither the employer/carrier's right to notice nor the benefits awarded was materially affected by the one-week variance in the accident date.


Headnotes

[1] A workers' compensation judge may establish a date of accident different from that claimed by the claimant if competent substantial evidence supports the judge's finding.

[2] A workers' compensation judge's determination of a date of accident, varying slightly from the date claimed, does not require specific notice to the parties if their righ…

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“The existence of this mental disability and the medical reports indicating a motion injury to claimant's spine on August 19,1987 support the JCC's findings that claimant sustained the current injury to his lower back on the 19th of August, and not on the 26th.”

Establishes the court's reasoning for accepting the August 19 date based on objective medical evidence and claimant's documented mental disability affecting date recall

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Claimant was employed by Plant City as a gardener and grave digger for several years prior to August 1987. While pulling weeds on his hands and knees …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
WENTWORTH, Judge.

WENTWORTH, Judge.

Employer/carrier seek review of a workers’ compensation order by which claimant was awarded temporary total disability compensation from August 26, 1987, to maximum medical improvement in June 1988, and permanent total disability benefits thereafter. The judge of compensation claims (JCC) found the date of accident to be August 19, 1987, despite claimant’s own testimony that the accident occurred one week later. The employer/carrier argue that no such accident occurred, or in the alternative, that it was improper for the judge of compensation claims (JCC) to “amend” the claim by establishing the date of accident without notice to the parties.

We affirm, finding competent substantial evidence that an accident resulting in a permanent injury occurred as found by the JCC, and concluding that in the circumstances shown by the record neither the employer/carrier’s right to notice nor the benefits awarded was materially affected by the JCC’s determination of a date of accident varying one week from that originally claimed.

Claimant, employed by Plant City as a gardener and grave digger for several years prior to the date of accident, had sustained an injury to his lower back some years prior to the current claim, and had obtained periodic medical treatment for his back since that first injury.

The testimony was that, while pulling weeds on his hands and knees one day during August 1987, claimant experienced a sudden, sharp pain in his lower back which he described as unlike any pain he had experienced before. The physician from whom claimant had been receiving treatment over the years testified that claimant had arrived at his office for an appointment sometime during August 1987 in a “new posture”: stooped over in pain and unable to stand upright. This physician diagnosed claimant with a “motion injury to the lumbar spine” on August 19, 1987.

Claimant testified that the injury to his lower back had occurred on Wednesday, August 26, 1987. However, according to employer records, claimant was absent from work on that day because of a death in his family. Those records document that the last day on which claimant worked for Plant City was Monday, August 24, 1987.

Claimant suffers from a congenital mental retardation which makes his memory unreliable for specifics such as dates. Testimony from his rehabilitation counselor demonstrated that claimant can remember the basic facts about an event but may be inaccurate in recalling when the event in question occurred. The existence of this mental disability and the medical reports indicating a motion injury to claimant’s spine on August 19,1987 support the JCC’s findings that claimant sustained the current injury to his lower back on the 19th of August, and not on the 26th.

Affirmed.

ERVIN and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw