HARRY H. BRENNER, AS RECEIVER FOR COMMERCIAL BANK & TRUST CO., APPELLANT,
v.
R. H. MCNIELL, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decree, finding no reversible error after reviewing the record, briefs, and arguments.
The Court held that there was no reversible error in the Circuit Court's decree.
“It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.”
This quote states the court's final decision on the appeal.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe case involved an appeal by Harry H. Brenner, as Receiver for Commercial Bank & Trust Co., against R. H. McNiell. The appeal was based on a transcr…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellate Review cases and more on FLexlaw
This cause having been submitted to the Court upoh the transcript of the record of the final decree herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no reversible error in the said decree. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed. Warren v. Creevey, 87 Fla. 46, 52, 99 So. 247, 249; Adams v. Essex, 1 Bibb (Ky.) 149, 4 Am. Dec. 623; Trustees of I. I. Fund v. Lewis, 34 Fla. 424, 16 So. 325; Taylor v. Am. National Bank, 63 Fla. 631, 57 So. 678; 3 R. C. L. 1272, section 502; Owings Lumber Co. vs. Marlowe, 200 Ala. 568, 76 So. 926; L. R. A. 1918-E, 180 et seq.; Sections 4499 and 5744 C. G. L., Scott vs. Taylor, 63 Fla. 612, 58 So. 30; McClure v. American Nat’l Bank, 67 Fla. 32, 64 So. 427; 8 C. J. 127, 342, 344, 478, 41 C. J. 507-509, 662, 693-4.
Affirmed.
Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Taylor v. Am. Nat'l Bank of Pensacola, 63 Fla. 631 (Fla. 1912)
- McClure v. Am. Nat'l Bank of Pensacola, 67 Fla. 32 (Fla. 1914)
- Scott v. Taylor, 63 Fla. 612 (Fla. 1912)
- Trs. of the Internal Improvement Fund v. Lewis, 34 Fla. 424 (Fla. 1894)
- Mary M. Warren and her husband v. Creevey, 87 Fla. 46 (Fla. 1924)