KEVIN L. SMITH
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment was affirmed based on applicable precedent.
Kevin L. Smith was involved in a criminal proceeding before the trial court. The specific facts are not detailed in this per curiam affirmance.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Judicial Precedent cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Maye v. State, 368 So. 3d 531, 532 (Fla. 6th DCA 2023), rev. granted 2024 WL 1796831 (Fla. April 25, 2024); Wainwright v. State, 411 So. 3d 392, 399 (Fla. 2025).
GROSS, MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Magneson v. State, 368 So. 3d 531 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024)
- Mateo v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2026)