GRISELDA DOMINGA EVELYN SANTANDER
v.
JOSE LEONARDO PERALTA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's order temporarily modifying child timesharing arrangements between the parties, finding no abuse of discretion in the trial court's decision.
The trial court did not abuse its broad discretion in temporarily modifying timesharing. Trial courts have very broad discretion in temporary relief orders in family law cases, and appellate courts are reluctant to interfere except under compelling circumstances.
“Temporary relief orders in family law cases are among the areas where trial judges have the very broadest discretion, which appellate courts are very reluctant to interfere with except under the most compelling of circumstances.”
Establishes the highly deferential standard of review for temporary family law orders and the breadth of trial court discretion in such matters.
The case involves a dispute between Griselda Dominga Evelyn Santander and Jose Leonardo Peralta concerning temporary modification of timesharing arran…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Abuse Of Discretion (Standard Of Review) cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
GRISELDA DOMINGA EVELYN SANTANDER, Appellant,
v. JOSE LEONARDO PERALTA, Appellee.
No. 4D2026-0240
[February 25, 2026]
Nonfinal appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Cheryl Annette Caracuzzo, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502020DR003221XXXXMB.
Griselda Dominga Evelyn Santander, Marysville, Washington, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We summarily affirm the order temporarily modifying timesharing. Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). The trial court did not abuse its broad discretion. Riddle v. Riddle, 214 So. 3d 694, 696 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (“Temporary relief orders in family law cases are among the areas where trial judges have the very broadest discretion, which appellate courts are very reluctant to interfere with except under the most compelling of circumstances.”).
Affirmed.
KUNTZ, C.J., MAY and GERBER, JJ., concur. * * *