LIMOINE ESTIME
v.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF REVENUE CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AND
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appellant's arguments not preserved in the administrative proceeding below are not reviewable on appeal, resulting in affirmance of the Department of Revenue's final order.
[1] Arguments not preserved in an administrative proceeding below are not reviewable on appeal from a Department of Revenue final paternity and support order, but affirmance…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceLimoine Estime, Jr. appealed the Department of Revenue's final administrative paternity and support order issued in a child support enforcement matter…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Administrative Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Limoine Estime, Jr. appeals the Department of Revenue’s final administrative paternity and support order. As his arguments on appeal were not preserved below, we affirm.
As in Lozano v. Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement, 311 So. 3d 59 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021), our affirmance is “without prejudice for the appellant to seek a modification of the final administrative support order as set forth in section 409.2563(12), Florida Statutes (2020), or a superseding order in the circuit court pursuant to section 409.2563(10)(c), Florida Statutes (2020).” Id.
Affirmed without prejudice.
CONNER, C.J., FORST and ARTAU, JJ., concur.