N.S.,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,

Fla. 3d DCA | 2020-08-19
No. 19-2425
315 So. 3d 63 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2020) Caution
Cited by 1 case


Per_curiam
Per Curiam

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 120.57(1)(k), Fla. Stat. (2019) (“[A]n agency need not rule on an exception that does not clearly identify the disputed portion of the recommended order by page number or paragraph, that does not identify the legal basis for the exception, or that does not include appropriate and specific citations to the record.”); Sanders v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 118 So. 3d 899, 900 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (“Section 120.68(8), Florida Statutes, requires affirmance of final agency action unless one of the statutory grounds for setting aside the final order is found by the reviewing court.”); Young v. Dep’t of Educ., Div. of Vocational Rehab., 943 So. 2d 901, 903 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (“Our review of the record indicates that the findings of fact are supported by competent and substantial evidence.”).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …se even though an expert testified that the father’s likelihood of abusing them was low, especially when he denied responsibility and blamed the victim). By contrast, this case is unlike the decision in A.D. v. Department of Children and Families, 315 So. 3d 63, 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020), where the court reversed a finding of dependency because the evidence failed to show the child needed any medicine his mother might deprive him of, and her abuse of his siblings twelve years ago did not show he was at imminen…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw