JULIA M. CESPEDES,
v.
ZENON GABRIEL CESPEDES,
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Factual Issues cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See LPP Mortg. Ltd. v. Bank of Am., N.A., 826 So. 2d 462, 463-64 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (“Whether relief should be granted pursuant to [Florida] Rule [of Civil Procedure] 1.540 is a fact specific question and the trial court’s ruling should not be disturbed on appeal absent a gross abuse of discretion.”) (citations omitted); see also Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal.”).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
- Miller v. Fla. Dep't OF Corr. & Fla. Parole Comm'n, 826 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)