ORLIER SUAREZ ALBO
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 3d DCA | 2020-04-01
No. 18-2531
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2020)


Per_curiam
Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.1 State, 219 So. 3d 189, 197 n.8 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (“For example, in a homicide prosecution, the jury is not permitted to consider any non-homicide lesser-included offenses (e.g., aggravated battery) even if such lesser-included offenses are subsumed within and necessarily established by proof of the murder charge, unless there is some disputed issue of fact (and some evidence to support a theory) regarding an intervening cause of death.”). See also State v. Barritt, 531 So. 2d 338, 339 (Fla. 1988); Martin v. State, 342 So. 2d 501, 503 (Fla. 1977) (superseded on other grounds by Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.490); Humphrey v. State, 690 So. 2d 1351 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). 1 We affirm without discussion Appellant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the jury’s verdict of guilty for leaving the scene of a crash involving death.

Footnotes
1 See Gordon v.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw