ROCHELLE DRIESSEN, ETC.,
v.
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, ET AL.,
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
[1] A court has inherent power to prevent abuse of court procedure that interferes with the effective administration of justice.
[2] When a party's activities upset the normal court procedure and interfere with other litigants' causes, restraint upon that party is necessary.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Balch v. HSBC Bank, USA, N.A., 128 So. 3d 179, 181 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) (“[W]hen one person, by his activities, upsets the normal procedure of the court so as to interfere with the causes of other litigants, it is necessary to exercise restraint upon that person, i.e., requirement that pleadings be accompanied by an attorney’s signature.”) (citation omitted); Favreau v. Favreau, 940 So. 2d 1188, 1189 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (“A court has the inherent power to prevent abuse of court procedure which interferes with the effective administration of justice.”) (citing Platel v. Maguire, Voorhis & Wells, P.A., 436 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)); see also Driessen v. Miami-Dade Cty. Sch. Bd., No. 3D19-0834 (Fla. 3d DCA June 13, 2019), dismissed, No. SC19-1016 (Fla. June 19, 2019); Driessen v. Sch. Bd. of Miami-Dade Cty., 255 So. 3d 839 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018), dismissed, No. SC 18-1765 (Fla. Oct. 24, 2018); Dreissen v. Emily C. Moises Day Training Ctr., 271 So. 3d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019), dismissed, No. SC18-396 (Fla. Mar. 13, 2018); Driessen v. Univ. of Miami Sch. of Law, 241 So. 3d 838 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018), dismissed, No. SC18-329 (Fla. Mar. 1, 2018); Driessen v. Univ. of Miami Sch. of Law, 242 So. 3d 1109 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017), review denied, No. SC17-1679 (Fla. Feb. 1, 2018); Driessen v. Miami-Dade Cty. Sch. Bd., 243 So. 3d 957 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017), review denied, No. SC17-1854 (Fla. Jan. 22, 2018); Driessen v. Univ. of Miami Sch. of Law, No. 3D19-0756 (Fla. 3d DCA April 29, 2019); Driessen v. Univ. of Miami Sch. of Law Children & Youth Law Clinic, 260 So. 3d 1080 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018);
Driessen v. Home Loan State Bank, 550 F. App’x 677 (10th Cir. 2014); Driessen v. Miami-Dade Cty. Sch. Bd., 520 F. App’x 912 (11th Cir. 2013); Driessen v. Miami-Dade Cty. Sch. Bd., 504 F. App’x 864 (11th Cir. 2013); Driessen v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 621 F. App’x 1 (D.C. Cir. 2015); Driessen v. Royal Bank Int’l, No. 3:14-CV-01300 (D. Conn. Mar. 2, 2015); Driessen v. Natwest Bank PLC, No. 13-cv-00217 (D. Conn. Oct. 25, 2013); Driessen v. Citibank, N.A., No. CIV 13-4018 (D.S.D. Aug. 26, 2013); In re Driessen v. Fla. Dep’t of Educ., No. 12-23697-CIV-KING (S.D. Fla. Aug. 2, 2013); Driessen v. Woodforest Nat’l Bank, 940 F. Supp. 2d 584 (S.D. Ohio 2013).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Platel v. Maguire, Voorhis & Wells, P.A., 436 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)
- Branch v. Dep't OF Health, 940 So. 2d 1188 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
- Annmarie Balch v. HSBC Bank, 128 So. 3d 179 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013)
- Driessen v. Univ. OF Miami Sch. OF LAW, 241 So. 3d 838 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)
- Driessen v. Miami-Dade Cnty. Sch. Bd., 243 So. 3d 957 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)
- Driessen v. The Sch. Bd. OF Miami-Dade Cnty., 255 So. 3d 839 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)
- Driessen v. Univ. of Miami Sch. of Law Child. & Youth Law Clinic, 260 So. 3d 1080 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)