KRISTIN L. COSCIA,
v.
SCOTT JAY FEDER,

Fla. 3d DCA | 2019-08-14
No. 18-1047
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2019)

Per_curiam
Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Coba v. Tricam Indus., Inc., 164 So. 3d 637, 643 (Fla. 2015) (“A jury’s verdict in a civil case is generally ‘clothed with a presumption of regularity.’ Thus, ‘an appellate court will not disturb a final judgment if there is competent, substantial evidence to support the verdict on which the judgment rests.’ ”) (citations omitted); Scandinavian World Cruises (Bahamas), Ltd. v. Cronin, 509 So. 2d 1277, 1280 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (“We have carefully considered [appellant’s] contentions in the light of the record, briefs and argument of counsel, and have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated.”); Kent Ins. Co. v. Hill, 442 So. 2d 288, 289 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (same); Thompson v. Jacobs, 314 So. 2d 797, 800 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw