EMMA YOLANDA SANTOS GONZALEZ
v.
SIMON LEVY DABBAH
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This is a per curiam dismissal without prejudice in a certiorari petition. The court applied established standards for granting writs of certiorari, requiring a departure from essential legal requirements resulting in material, irreparable injury that cannot be corrected on postjudgment appeal.
The court dismissed the certiorari petition without prejudice, implying the petitioner failed to establish the necessary jurisdictional prerequisites for certiorari relief.
[1] To obtain a writ of certiorari, there must exist a departure from the essential requirements of the law, resulting in material injury for the remainder of the case that c…
[2] The elements of material injury and the inability to correct harm on postjudgment appeal are jurisdictional and must be analyzed before considering whether there has been…
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“It is well settled that to obtain a writ of certiorari, there must exist: (1) a departure from the essential requirements of the law, (2) resulting in material injury for the remainder of the case (3) that cannot be corrected on postjudgment appeal.”
Establishes the three-part test required for certiorari relief.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe opinion does not provide specific facts about the underlying dispute between the parties. The case involves a certiorari petition challenging what…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Material Injury cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed without prejudice. Reeves v. Fleetwood Homes of Fla., Inc., 889 So. 2d 812, 822 (Fla. 2004) (“It is well settled that to obtain a writ of certiorari, there must exist: (1) a departure from the essential requirements of the law, (2) resulting in material injury for the remainder of the case (3) that cannot be corrected on postjudgment appeal.”) (quotation omitted); Williams v. Oken, 62 So. 3d 1129, 1132-33 (Fla. 2011) (noting: “The last two elements are jurisdictional and must be analyzed before the court may even consider the first element.”); see also Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. San Perdido Ass’n, Inc., 104 So. 3d 344, 351 (Fla. 2012) (“In other words, before certiorari can be used to review non-final orders, the appellate court must focus on the threshold jurisdictional question: whether there is a material injury that cannot be corrected on appeal, otherwise termed as irreparable harm.”).
Compare Beekie v. Morgan, 751 So. 2d 694, 698 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (noting: “Ordinarily, trial court orders refusing to compel discovery are not reviewed by certiorari because it is believed any harm caused by the denial can be adequately remedied on appeal from the final order”, but that “[t]he failure to permit a deposition, or allow a party to answer questions during a deposition, has been held to be subject to certiorari relief.”) (citing Medero v. Florida Power and Light Co., 658 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) and Sabol v. Bennett, 672 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Reeves v. Fleetwood Homes OF Fla., Inc., 889 So. 2d 812 (Fla. 2004)
- Williams v. Keith Robinson Oken, M.D., 62 So. 3d 1129 (Fla. 2011)
- Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. SAN Perdido Ass'n, Inc., 104 So. 3d 344 (Fla. 2012)
- Herman v. Herman, 751 So. 2d 694 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
- Medero v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 658 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
- Dusan Sabol, M.D. v. Bennett, 672 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)