RUSSELL ATWOOD FOUST, III, APPELLANT,
v.
DINA DARLENE NIPPER KNORR FOUST, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Abuse Of Discretion (Standard Of Review) cases and more on FLexlaw
RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.
Russell Atwood Foust, III (father) seeks review of the trial court’s determination that Dina Foust (mother) be the primary residential parent of their minor child.
Upon consideration of the briefs, the oral arguments and the record before us, this court affirms the judgment entered below, as appellant has made no abuse of discretion appear. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Strate v. Strate, 328 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 336 So. 2d 1184 (1976); Fishman v. Fishman, 245 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971).
The burden of showing error rests on the appellant, because decisions of the lower court reach the appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness. Brackin v. Brackin, 190 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966), cert. denied, 201 So. 2d 230 (Fla.1967); Strate; Fishman. Here, no reversible error has been demonstrated. Accordingly, the final judgment and order appealed are affirmed.
Affirmed.
SCHOONOVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Straley v. Frank, 585 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…r jointly owned funds. The trial court denied Mark any special equity in any of these properties. This decision arrives at our court clothed with the presumption of correctness. Gevertz v. Gevertz, 566 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Foust v. Foust, 561 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 564 So. 2d 1085 (Fla. 1990); Seijas v. Seijas, 557 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Kirchinger v. Kirchinger, 546 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). Only if there is no basis in the record to support Stacy’s position on the gift…
-
Laskey v. Peeler, 704 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)…AFFIRMED. DAUKSCH and HARRIS, JJ., concur. . See Spradley v. Spradley, 335 So. 2d 822 (Fla.1976); In re Gregory, 313 So. 2d 735 (Fla.1975). . In re Gregory, 313 So. 2d 735 (Fla.1975); Lee v. Lee, 563 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Foust v. Foust, 561 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 564 So. 2d 1085 (Fla.1990).…
-
Straley v. Frank, 612 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)…remarital assets with other jointly owned funds and properties. The trial court’s denial of any special equity in these premarital assets for Stra-ley should be affirmed in toto. Gevertz v. Gevertz, 566 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 3d DCA1990); Foust v. Foust, 561 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 564 So. 2d 1085 (Fla. 1990); Seijas v. Seijas, 557 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 3d DCA1990); Kirchinger v. Kirchinger, 546 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 2d DCA1989). Only if there is no basis in the record to support Frank’s position on the specia…
Authorities Cited
- Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980)
- Strate v. Strate, 328 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
- Dores R. Fishman v. Fishman, 245 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)
- Frauken Elizabeth Brackin v. Brackin, 190 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966)
- Lewellen v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 190 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)
- Rose v. The Florida Bar, 201 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 1967)
- Collins v. Zack Co., 201 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 1967)