YVERN JONES,
v.
IVY M. REID,
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court reversed a final judgment for eviction, finding that the trial court erred by entering a default judgment while the tenant's answer, affirmative defenses, and motion to determine rent were still pending. The court treated the landlord's pleading as a confession of error.
Yes, the trial court erred in entering the default final judgment. The entry of final judgment was premature and erroneous because the tenant's responsive pleadings and motion to determine rent were undisposed of.
[1] A trial court errs by entering a default final judgment when a tenant has timely filed an answer, affirmative defenses, and a motion to determine rent.
[2] An undisposed-of motion to determine rent precludes the entry of a final judgment in an eviction action.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Upon our review of the record, and Landlord’s pleading (which we treat as a confession of error), we reverse the final judgment and remand for further proceedings.”
Establishes the court's decision to reverse and treat the landlord's submission as an admission of error.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceA tenant filed an answer, affirmative defenses (including retaliatory eviction), and a motion to determine rent in response to an eviction complaint. …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion To Determine Rent cases and more on FLexlaw
EMAS, J.
Yvern Jones (“Tenant”) appeals from a Final Judgment for Removal of Tenant following an eviction complaint filed by Ivy M. Reid (“Landlord”). Upon our review of the record, and Landlord’s pleading (which we treat as a confession of error), we reverse the final judgment and remand for further proceedings.
In response to Landlord’s eviction complaint, Tenant timely filed an answer and affirmative defenses as well as a motion for determination of rent. The answer denied the material allegations of the complaint; the affirmative defenses raised legal and equitable defenses, including a claim of retaliatory eviction; and moved for a determination of rent, alleging that Tenant was a “Section 8 voucher participant” and requesting the trial court determine how much (if any) rent Tenant was required to deposit into the registry of the court.
Landlord thereafter filed a motion requesting the court enter a default final judgment, asserting as a basis that Tenant “has not vacated the premises as requested in the complaint.” The timely answer and affirmative defenses, and the motion to determine rent (as well as Landlord’s motion to strike answer and enter default) all remained pending when the trial court, without a hearing, entered an unelaborated Final Judgment for Removal of Tenant.
Tenant sought rehearing and moved to vacate the default final judgment, which was denied, but the trial court stayed the writ of possession during the pendency of this appeal. Given the procedural posture of the case, the trial court’s entry of final judgment was erroneous.
See Crawford v. Grubb, 337 So. 3d 521 (Fla. 2d DCA 2022) (reversing final judgment of eviction, where trial court prematurely entered a default final judgment after tenant filed a timely answer and affirmative defenses).
See also Axen v. Poah Cutler Manor, LLC, 323 So. 3d 800, 801 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (reversing final judgment of eviction because “the undisposed-of motion to determine rent precluded entry of final judgment”); Prince v. MCR Apts. 1, LLC, 326 So. 3d 228 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (reversing final judgment of eviction when motion to determine rent remained pending and unresolved).
We therefore reverse and remand with directions to vacate the default final judgment and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Artheisha Axen v. Poah Cutler Manor, LLC, 323 So. 3d 800 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)
- Prince v. MCR Apts. 1, LLC, 326 So. 3d 228 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)
- LEA Crawford v. Grubb, 337 So. 3d 521 (Fla. 2d DCA 2022)