MONA KAMAL ABOUELSEOUD
v.
AIM RECOVERY SERVICES, INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court dismissed a petitioner's appeal, finding it lacked jurisdiction to review a circuit court's decision that dismissed the petitioner's prior appeals from county court judgments. The court determined the petitioner failed to demonstrate a departure from the essential requirements of law or a lack of procedural due process.
The appellate court lacks jurisdiction to hear direct appeals from the circuit court's appellate division dispositions in this type of case. Treating the notice of appeal as a petition for second-tier certiorari, the court held that the petitioner failed to show a departure from the essential requirements of law or a lack of procedural due process.
[1] A notice of appeal from a circuit court appellate division disposition of county court judgments may be treated as a petition for second-tier certiorari if the appellate…
[2] Second-tier certiorari review is limited to determining whether the circuit court afforded procedural due process and applied the correct law, or departed from the essent…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“This court lacks jurisdiction to hear further direct appeals from circuit court appellate division dispositions of county court judgments and final orders of the kind involved here.”
Establishes the court's lack of direct appellate jurisdiction.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe petitioner, Ms. AbouElSeoud, appealed five adverse rulings from county court to the circuit court appellate division. Her appeals repeatedly faile…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Departure From Essential Requirements Of Law cases and more on FLexlaw
SALTER, J.
The petitioner, Ms. AbouElSeoud, was the defendant and, ultimately, the judgment debtor, in a county court civil case brought by the respondent here, AIM Recovery Services, Inc. (“AIM Recovery”). She initiated pro se appeals from five adverse rulings and judgments in the county court case to the circuit court appellate division, which consolidated the five appeals. Though the appeals were commenced in 2013 and 2014, Ms. AbouElSeoud repeatedly filed briefs and purported record materials which failed to comply, substantially or otherwise, with the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.
In 2018, in addressing AIM Recovery’s motion to strike the amended initial brief and to dismiss the appeal, the circuit court appellate division gave Ms. AbouElSeoud a final opportunity to file a conforming (and second amended) initial brief, failing which the consolidated appeals would be dismissed. In October 2018, the circuit court appellate division granted AIM Recovery’s motion to strike and to dismiss the five consolidated appeals. Ms. AbouElSeoud then filed a notice of appeal to this court.
This court lacks jurisdiction to hear further direct appeals from circuit court appellate division dispositions of county court judgments and final orders of the kind involved here. Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(b)(1). Pursuant to Rule 9.030(b)(2)(B), however, we do have so-called second-tier certiorari jurisdiction to review “final orders of circuit courts acting in their review capacity.”
In order to provide a “complete determination of the cause” in this case (Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.040(a)), we treat Ms. AbouElSeoud’s notice of appeal and briefs as a petition for second-tier certiorari. Our inquiry in such a case is whether the circuit court “afforded procedural due process and whether the circuit court applied the correct law, or, as otherwise stated, departed from the essential requirements of law.” Custer Med. Ctr. v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 62 So. 3d 1086, 1092 (Fla. 2010); Florida Wellness & Rehab. Ctr., Inc. v. Mark J. Feldman, P.A., 276 So. 3d 884, 887-88 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019). As Ms. AboulElSeoud has failed to show that (1) procedural due process was not afforded by the circuit court appellate division, and (2) the court departed from the essential requirements of law, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to grant relief. Petition for further review dismissed as to each of the five consolidated cases below.