B. W.
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, ET AL.,
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This is a dependency case in which B.W. appeals from a circuit court decision involving the Department of Children and Families and the Guardian Ad Litem Office regarding a child, J.N.R. The District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision.
The District Court of Appeal affirmed the Circuit Court's decision without providing detailed reasoning or analysis in this per curiam opinion.
The case involves a child, J.N.R., and concerns the involvement of the Department of Children and Families and the Guardian Ad Litem Office. The speci…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
In the Interest of J.N.R., a child. ___________________________ B.W.,
Appellant,
v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, and GUARDIAN AD LITEM OFFICE, Appellees.
No. 2D2024-2116
May 16, 2025
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Linda Babb, Judge. Amanda Peterson of Law Offices of Peterson, P.A., Mulberry, for Appellant. Bruce Bartlett, State Attorney, Sixth Judicial Circuit; and Leslie M. Layne, Assistant State Attorney, Clearwater, for Appellee Department of Children and Families. Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, Tallahassee; Caitlin E. Burke, Senior Attorney, Tallahassee; and Charles S.E. Greenberg, Defending Best Interest Project, Tallahassee, Pro Bono for Appellee Statewide Guardian Ad Litem Office.
PER CURIAM.
2
Affirmed.
LaROSE, KHOUZAM, and SMITH, JJ., Concur. __________________________ Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.