MICHAEL J. ANDERSON AND MICHAELJAY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,

v.

PILOT HOUSE OF ST. PETERSBURG, INC., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Shep Harris, Jr. v. Zenoria T. McKINNEY, 20 So. 3d 400 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
  …evolution of this distinction is the intended result of the Rowe ruling. . This is not to suggest that the Giltex court was the first to conclude that such attorney's fees orders are reversible. See Anderson v. Pilot House of St. Petersburg, Inc., 559 So. 2d 419, 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) (reversing order for "fail[ure] to make written findings”); [*407] Maas v. Maas, 541 So. 2d 160, 160 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989) ("[T]he final judgment is facially invalid since it fails to set forth specific findings regarding the am…
• Beckett v. Dep't OF Fin. Servs., 982 So. 2d 94 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)
  …phasized that “[t]he question is whether [Appellant] added ancillary products to the three aggrieved customers’ orders without their informed consent.” The ALJ then noted that, under Thomas v. State of Florida, Department of Insurance and Treasurer, 559 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), it was his duty to determine whether Appellant’s explanation was sufficient to render the customers’ consent “informed.” As to this issue, the ALJ found that, based on the evidence presented, it was clear that the aggrieved custo…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Durie v. In re Guardianship OF Mary Nugent Durie, 578 So. 2d 474 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
  …attorney’s fees and remand for entry of written findings as required by Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So. 2d 1145 (Fla.1985). Fineman v. Fineman, 564 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Anderson v. Pilot House of St. Petersburg, Inc., 559 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). Reversed and remanded.…

Authorities Cited

• Fla. Patient's Comp. Fund v. Rowe, 472 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 1985)