WILLIAM R. COLON, APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF SUNRISE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, AND THE CANVASSING BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY, APPELLEES
WILLIAM R. COLON, APPELLANT,
CITY OF SUNRISE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, AND THE CANVASSING BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY, APPELLEES
558 So. 2d 1079
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The City of Sunrise conducted a referendum as to a charter amendment which would change from the strong mayor to the city manager form of government. The proposal passed. After-the-fact Mr. William R. Colon filed suit seeking to have the election result voided.
Final summary judgment was entered which denied Mr. Colon’s challenge. Mr. Colon appeals. We approve the well reasoned judgment and thereby determine that Mr. Colon has failed, in this court, to demonstrate any reversible error. AFFIRMED.
DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Honey Transp., Inc. v. Leafar R. Ruiz, 893 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)…d the discovery of photographs without making any findings “as to whether the material and statements sought were prepared ... in anticipation of litigation, in which case the privilege may be raised ....” Id. at 1134; see also Home v. K-Mart Corp., 558 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 4th DCA)(holding a videotape made in anticipation of litigation was protected by the work-product rule and required a showing of need and undue hardship to compel discovery), rev. denied, 569 So. 2d 1279 (Fla.1990). Based on these two cases, a…
-
Suarez v. Alexander (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)