FORKLIFTS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA AND GAB BUSINESS SERVICES, APPELLANTS,
v.
JACK BUTLER, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the award of vocational rehabilitation benefits was improper as it exceeded the scope of the claim litigated, but affirmed the award of medical and temporary disability benefits.
Appellants appealed an order awarding medical, temporary disability, and vocational rehabilitation benefits to appellee, finding appellee's osteomyeli…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Causal Relationship cases and more on FLexlaw
WIGGINTON, Judge.
Appellants, employer/carrier, appeal the judge of compensation claims’ order awarding medical, temporary disability and vocational rehabilitation benefits to appellee, upon a finding that appellee’s osteomyelitis was caused by a work-related accident. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Competent substantial evidence supports the judge’s decision that appellee’s osteomyelitis is causally related to his May 20, 1988, work-related accident. Therefore, we affirm the award of medical and temporary disability benefits.
In his claim for benefits and in the pretrial stipulation, appellant requested authorization of a vocational rehabilitation evaluation by American International Health and Rehabilitation Services. The record does not indicate that the claim was ever amended or that the issue of entitlement to vocational rehabilitation benefits was litigated. Nevertheless, in his order, the judge directed:
3.That the employer and carrier shall authorize and pay for vocational rehabilitation by American International Health and Rehabilitation Services.
The judge’s award of vocational rehabilitation benefits exceeded the scope of the claim and of the hearing. See Brown v. Broward Minority Builders, 431 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Therefore, we reverse paragraph 3 of the decretal portion of the order insofar as it exceeds the benefits claimed, without prejudice to petition further for vocational rehabilitation. Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
ERVIN and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Brown v. Broward Minority Builders Coal., Inc., 431 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
- McDANIEL v. Sheffield, 431 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)