LINDA M. BOCZAR, M.D. AND LINDA M. BOCZAR, M.D., P.A., APPELLANTS,
v.
DAVID GLENDENING, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1990-01-19
No. 89-01062
CAMPBELL, C.J., and LEHAN, J. concur.
555 So. 2d 1286 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1990) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Dr. Linda Boczar sought attorney's fees after prevailing on summary judgment in a medical malpractice suit brought by a convicted sex offender. The appellate court reversed the denial of fees, holding that the case lacked any justiciable issue because statutory immunity applied absolutely and the case should never have been filed.


Holding

The court reversed the denial of attorney's fees and held that attorney's fees must be awarded because Glendening's action was completely devoid of merit, presenting a complete absence of any justiciable issue of either law or fact given that Dr. Boczar was entitled to absolute statutory immunity under Florida law.


Headnotes

[1] A trial court must find a complete absence of a justiciable issue of law or fact raised by the losing party to award attorney's fees under section 57.105, Florida Statute…

[2] Attorney's fees are awardable when an action is so clearly devoid of merit, both factually and legally, as to be completely untenable.

Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“the court must find a "complete absence of a justiciable issue of either law or fact raised by the losing party."”

Establishes the legal standard for awarding attorney's fees under section 57.105, Florida Statutes

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

David Glendening was convicted of sexual battery on a child under eleven and sentenced to life imprisonment with a 25-year minimum mandatory sentence.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
RYDER, Judge.

RYDER, Judge.

Linda M. Boczar, M.D. challenges the trial court’s order denying her motion for attorney’s fees. We reverse.

Appellee, David Glendening, was arrested, tried and convicted of sexual battery on a person under eleven years of age and sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum mandatory sentence of twenty-five years. On appeal, this court affirmed his conviction. See Glendening v. State, 503 So. 2d 335 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Thereafter, Glendening filed a medical malpractice action against Boczar, alleging that Boczar was negligent in examining his three-year-old daughter. The trial court granted final summary judgment in favor of Boczar, specifically finding that Boczar had judicial immunity from civil prosecution because her examination and subsequent statements were made in the course of the judicial proceedings involving Glendening as a defendant in criminal proceedings; that Boczar had no legal duty to Glendening since her examination was performed upon Glenden-ing’s daughter; that Boczar had statutory immunity from civil liability under the provisions of sections 415.502 through 415.514, Florida Statutes (1987).

Upon appeal of the final summary judgment, we affirmed and granted attorney’s fees. The amount of the fees were to be set by the trial court. After a hearing on attorney’s fees, the trial judge entered an order denying attorney’s fees.

In order for a trial court to award attorney’s fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1987), the court must find a “complete absence of a justiciable issue of either law or fact raised by the losing party.” Whitten v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co., 410 So. 2d 501 (Fla.1982). Attorney’s fees are awardable when the “action is so clearly devoid of merit both on the facts and the law as to be completely untenable.” Allen v. Estate of Dutton, 384 So. 2d 171 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980) (emphasis in original). See also State, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Thompson, 552 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Brinson v. Creative Aluminum Products, Inc., 519 So. 2d 59 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

Section 415.511, Florida Statutes (1987), specifically grants immunity from civil liability to any person acting in good faith, as required by sections 415.502—415.514, Florida Statutes (1987). The absence of good faith was never an issue in this case; therefore, the immunity here is absolute. The intent of the immunity statute is for the protection of the child to insure that doctors and others are freely willing and able to bring people to justice. Section 415.504(1) mandates that a report be made when one knows “or has reasonable cause to suspect” that a child is being abused. If the doctors and others do not report such suspicions, they render themselves liable for criminal prosecution and could be guilty of a second degree misdemeanor. § 415.513, Fla.Stat. (1987).

The public policy of this state is to protect these people, as enumerated by the legislature in the statute. Because the legislature granted complete immunity, the case should never have been filed, because there is a complete absence of any justiciable issue of either law or fact. Whitten.

The decision below is reversed and remanded. Upon remand, the trial court shall order an award of attorney’s fees for services rendered on both trial and appeal.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and LEHAN, J. concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Cunningham v. Fla. Dep't OF Child. & Families, 782 So. 2d 913 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)
    …da Parole Comm’n, 768 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (holding that the parole commission acted within the scope of its quasi-judicial duties and therefore had judicial immunity when it placed an inmate on conditional release); Boczar v. Glendening, 555 So. 2d 1286 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) (noting that a physician enjoyed judicial immunity from a claim of medical negligence in examining a child victim because the examination was made in the course of a judicial proceeding); Zock v. Miller, 505 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 3d DCA…
  • Dolin v. West, 22 F. Supp. 2d 1343 (M.D. Fla. 1998)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw