OUTBOARD MARINE DOMESTIC INTERNATIONAL SALES CORP. AND YATACHA C.A., FOR USE AND BENEFIT OF UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, APPELLANTS,
v.
ALFA AEROFREIGHT SERVICE, INC., A & B AUTO PARTS, INC., PARTS EXPORTERS, INC., FLORIDA STEVEDORING CO., INC., AND G.J. CERDA, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Outboard Marine sued Dade County for negligence after a trailer containing outboard engines was stolen from the Port of Miami, alleging the county's gate guard failed to verify a signature on a cargo clearance form. The court affirmed summary judgment for the county, holding that the county had no duty to verify signatures on clearance forms and was protected by sovereign immunity.
No. Dade County owed no statutory or common law duty to verify signatures on cargo clearance forms, and therefore sovereign immunity barred the negligence claim. The gate guard was not a security guard, and the county had no duty to provide security services to stevedoring companies leasing space at the port.
[1] Governmental tort liability requires an underlying common law or statutory duty of care with respect to the alleged negligent conduct.
[2] A county has no duty to provide security to stevedoring companies leasing space at a port.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“[F]or there to be governmental tort liability, there must be either an underlying common law or statutory duty of care with respect to the alleged negligent conduct.”
Establishes the foundational principle that sovereign immunity protects government entities unless a duty of care exists.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceIn February 1979, Outboard Marine stored a trailer with forty-six cartons of outboard engines on leased premises at the Port of Miami operated by Elle…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Governmental Tort Liability cases and more on FLexlaw
JORGENSON, Judge.
Outboard Marine Domestic International Sales Corp. (Outboard) appeals from an order of final summary judgment entered in favor of Dade County. We affirm.
Dade County owns Dodge Island on which the Port of Miami is located. The county leases operating and warehouse space to stevedoring companies and dock space and terminals to shipping lines. The record shows that the county never handles private property and does not assume the care, custody, or control of cargo within the port.
In February, 1979, Outboard stored a trailer containing forty-six cartons of outboard engines on the leased premises of stevedore Eller & Company at the Port of Miami. Because its storage facilities were overcrowded, Eller & Company parked the trailer along a roadside within the port. The trailer was stolen by persons unknown. Outboard sued various parties, including Dade County, and alleged in its complaint that Dade County, through its gate guard, was negligent in failing to verify the signature on the cargo clearance form presented by the thief.
The county moved for summary judgment on the grounds that it had no statutory or common law duty to confirm the signature on the clearance form and that sovereign immunity, therefore, barred the claim for damages. The trial court granted the county’s motion; we affirm. “[F]or there to be governmental tort liability, there must be either an underlying common law or statutory duty of care with respect to the alleged negligent conduct.” Trianon Park Condominium Ass’n v. City of Hialeah, 468 So. 2d 912 (Fla.1985) (city had no general common law or statutory duty to enforce compliance with building code; action against city by condominium association for negligent inspection of their building thus barred by sovereign immunity).
Outboard failed to establish the existence of any duty for the county to verify a signature on a cargo clearance form. Moreover, the record shows that the gate guard was not a security guard and that Dade County had no duty to provide security to the stevedoring companies that leased space at the Port of Miami. Because no duty existed, no action lies against the county.1
Affirmed.
. We reject Outboard's argument that the trial court erred in denying its motion for summary judgment based on admiralty law and federal preemption. Maritime locality alone does not trigger maritime tort jurisdiction. Kelly v. Smith, 485 F. 2d 520 (5th Cir.1973), cert. denied sub nom. Chicot Land Co. v. Kelly, 416 U.S. 969, 94 S.Ct. 1991, 40 L.Ed.2d 558 (1974).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Trianon Park Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. City OF Hialeah, 468 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 1985)
- Garland Wayne Kelly and Allen Eugene Kelly, Sr. v. Smith, 485 F.2d 520 (5th Cir. 1973)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc., 416 U.S. 969 (U.S. 1974)
- Train v. City of N.Y., 416 U.S. 969 (U.S. 1974)