PETER LUCHINA, APPELLANT,
v.
THE HONORABLE HOWARD C. BERMAN, IN HIS CAPACITY AS JUDGE OF THE COUNTY COURT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PETER LUCHINA, APPELLANT,
THE HONORABLE HOWARD C. BERMAN, IN HIS CAPACITY AS JUDGE OF THE COUNTY COURT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLEE
555 So. 2d 939
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1990)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
REVERSED. We agree with appellant that the county court record reflects that the state failed to . establish sufficient grounds to extend the time within which appellant was entitled to be brought to trial under Rule 3.191(d)(2), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (1987). See R.L.K. v. Hastings, 370 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Watts v. State, 516 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
ANSTEAD, WALDEN and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Watts v. State, 516 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
- In the Interest of R.L.K. v. Honorable Alcee L. Hastings, 370 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979)