PARADISE GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER A/A/O JOSE ALFONSO,
v.
ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY,
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This case involves medical providers appealing summary judgments granted to insurers. The court affirmed that the insurance policies provided sufficient notice of the insurer's intent to use permissive fee schedules but reversed because the insurers failed to provide evidence of payment according to those schedules.
The court held that the policies at issue did provide legally sufficient notice of the insurer's election to use the permissive fee schedules. However, the court also held that the insurers failed to provide evidence of payment pursuant to these fee schedules.
[1] An insurer may elect to use permissive fee schedules for medical services under personal injury protection policies, provided the policies provide legally sufficient noti…
[2] Summary judgment for an insurer on claims of breach of personal injury protection policies is inappropriate where the record lacks evidence that the insurer paid benefits…
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“We discern no error and affirm the entry of summary judgment to the extent the trial court found that the policies at issue provide legally sufficient notice of the insurer’s election to use the permissive fee schedules identified in section 627.736(5)(a)2., Florida Statutes (2009).”
Establishes the court's affirmation regarding the sufficiency of notice in the insurance policies.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMedical providers appealed summary judgments entered in favor of insurers who allegedly breached personal injury protection policies by not paying for…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Summary Judgment Evidence cases and more on FLexlaw
LOBREE, J. In this consolidated appeal,1 the medical providers appeal final summary judgments entered in favor of the insurers (collectively referred to as “Allstate”), on respective claims that Allstate breached the applicable personal injury protection policies by failing to pay benefits due for medical services provided to the insureds. We discern no error and affirm the entry of summary judgment to the extent the trial court found that the policies at issue provide legally sufficient notice of the insurer’s election to use the permissive fee schedules identified in section 627.736(5)(a)2., Florida Statutes (2009).2 Co. v. Orthopedic Specialists, 212 So. 3d
973, 979 (Fla. 2017). We are constrained to otherwise reverse, however, because the record is devoid of an affidavit, or any summary judgment evidence, showing that Allstate paid pursuant to the fee schedules. See Gonzalez v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 273 So. 3d 1031, 1036 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (explaining that summary judgment movant “must offer sufficient admissible evidence to support his claim of the non-existence of a genuine issue. If he fails to do this his motion is lost.” (quoting Harvey Bldg., Inc. v. Haley, 175 So. 2d 780, 782–83 (Fla. 1965))). As such, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Affirmed, in part, reversed, in part, and remanded.
Tampa v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 334 So. 3d 577, 582 (Fla. 2021). This renumbering has no impact on our analysis.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Holland Paving Co., Inc. v. Dann, 175 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 1965)
- Yosvani Gonzalez and Yenisleidy Perez v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 273 So. 3d 1031 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. Revival Chiropractic, LLC, 334 So. 3d 577 (Fla. 2024)
- J.M.B. v. State, 776 So. 2d 353 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)