SUPERIOR AUTO GLASS OF TAMPA BAY, INC., AS ASSIGNEE OF DAVID GILBO AND RONALD ROBBINS
v.
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This case involves an appeal regarding the conditions for awarding attorney's fees. The appellate court found that the lower court erred by conditioning the award of attorney's fees on prevailing in the underlying proceeding, rather than on meeting the statutory requirements for an offer of settlement.
Yes, the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of the law by conditioning the attorney's fees award on prevailing at trial. The statute requires satisfaction of specific offer of settlement requirements, not necessarily prevailing.
[1] An award of attorney's fees under Florida's offer of settlement statute is governed by the statutory requirements for the offer itself and need not be conditioned upon th…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“We grant the petition to the extent that the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of the law by granting Government Employees Insurance Company's (GEICO) motion for attorney's fees only on the condition that GEICO prevail in the underlying proceeding.”
Establishes the court's finding of error in the lower court's decision.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceSuperior Auto Glass, as assignee, sought review of a circuit court decision. The circuit court had granted GEICO's motion for attorney's fees, but con…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Good Faith Offer cases and more on FLexlaw
ATKINSON, Judge.
Superior Auto Glass of Tampa Bay, Inc., as assignee of David Gilbo and Ronald Robbins, seeks second-tier certiorari review of a decision of the circuit court sitting in its appellate capacity. We grant the petition to the extent that the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of the law by granting Government Employees Insurance Company's (GEICO) motion for attorney's fees only on the condition that GEICO prevail in the underlying proceeding. We deny the petition in all other respects without further comment.
The circuit court's order, in relevant part, states the following: "GEICO's motion for appellate attorney's fees is GRANTED for its appeal of the judgment, conditioned upon its prevailing in the underlying proceeding." GEICO moved for attorney's fees based on the offer of settlement statute, section 768.79, Florida Statutes (2020).
The offer of settlement statute requires a party seeking an award of attorney's fees to satisfy a number of requirements independent of prevailing at trial. See § 768.79(2), (3), (6)(a), (7)(a) (listing the form, content, and service requirements the offer must meet to qualify as an offer of settlement under the statute and providing that a trial court may deny a motion for attorney's fees based on an offer that was not made in good faith even if all the other statutory requirements are satisfied).
The circuit court departed from the essential requirements of the law by conditioning GEICO's award of attorney's fees on prevailing at trial instead of on the satisfaction of all the requirements of the offer of settlement statute. Cf. United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Comprehensive Health Ctr., 173 So. 3d 1061, 1069–70 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) ("[F]ailure . . . to grant an award of appellate fees, conditioned upon meeting the terms of the offer of judgment statute . . . is a departure from the essential requirements of the law." (emphasis added) (citing State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Rembrandt Mobile Diagnostics, Inc., 93 So. 3d 1161, 1161 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012))).
Thus, we quash the portion of the circuit court's order conditionally granting GEICO's motion for attorney's fees and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Petition granted in part and denied in part; order quashed in part; remanded. VILLANTI, J., Concurs. KELLY, J., Dissents.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Rembrandt Mobile Diagnostics, Inc., 93 So. 3d 1161 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)
- United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Comprehensive Health Ctr., 173 So. 3d 1061 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)