CAREY HAYNES
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 2d DCA | 2020-12-30
No. 19-1336
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2020)


Opinion of the Court
Atkinson

VILLANTI, Judge. For the reasons expressed in Morgan v. State, 293 So. 3d 1081 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, No. SC20-641, 2020 WL 3494396 (Fla. June 29, 2020), we affirm. As in Morgan, we certify conflict with the Fourth and Fifth District Courts of

- 2 - Appeal in Jones v. State, 279 So. 3d 172 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019), and Magill v. State, 287 So. 3d 1262 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019).1 MORRIS and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur. 1In Morgan we also certified conflict with the First District Court of Appeal in Simmons v. State, 274 So. 3d 468 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019), and Jordan v. State, 81 So. 3d 595 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). However, as the First District has since receded from Simmons and Jordan, see Rogers v. State, 296 So. 3d 500, 505 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) (en banc), we do not repeat that part of our certification in the present case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw