JOSEPH BOEHM, APPELLANT,

v.

PHYLLIS KOVENS, ET AL., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• In re Standard Jury Instructions IN Civil Cases-Report NO. 09-01 (Reorganization of the Civil Jury Instructions). In re Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases-Report No. 09-02 (Greater Weight of the Evidence, 35 So. 3d 666 (Fla. 2010)
  …has reason to speak concerning claimant to an appropriate audience on a particular subject or occasion. Such a person is not liable without proof of “express malice” as described in instruction 405.9c. Nodar, 462 So. 2d at 811 n. 8; Boehm v. Kovens, 554 So. 2d 622 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Nodar describes the qualified privilege as granted to one having an interest or a legal, moral, or social duty in regard to a certain subject, when speaking to another “having a corresponding interest or duty.” Examples: “a commu…
• In re Standard Jury Instructions (Civil Cases 89-1), 575 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 1991)
  …ment if he has reason to speak concerning claimant to an appropriate audience on a particular subject or occasion. Such a person is not liable without proof of “express malice” as described in MI 4.3c. Nodar, 462 So. 2d at 811 n. 8; Boehm v. Kovens, 554 So. 2d 622 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Nodar describes the qualified privilege as granted to one having an interest or a legal, moral, or social duty in regard to a certain subject, when speaking to another “having a corresponding interest or duty.” Examples: “a commu…

Authorities Cited

• Bovis v. 7-Eleven, Inc., 505 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)
• Stolzenberg v. Forte Towers S., Inc., 430 So. 2d 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
• Veterans GAS Co. v. Gibbs, 538 So. 2d 1325 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
• Riguard Colon v. Serafín Lara and Carmen Lara, 389 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
• Stewart v. Stewart, 389 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)