BRIAN A. HALLMAN
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 1st DCA | 2022-11-30
No. 2021-2392
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2022)


Per_curiam
Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

We affirm these consolidated appeals in all respects, but remand for entry of a corrected order of revocation of probation which conforms to the circuit court’s oral pronouncements during the VOP hearing. The circuit court found one violation of condition (4) and two violations of condition (5), but the written orders each list two violations of condition (4) and four violations of condition (5). The nonconforming written orders are thus in error. See, e.g., Brockington v. State, 276 So. 3d 521 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (reversing for written order conforming to oral pronouncement in Anders case); Givens v. State, 263 So. 3d 272 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (remanding for written order conforming to oral pronouncement).

AFFIRMED in part and REMANDED in part for entry of a conformed order. ROBERTS, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. _____________________________


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw