COLLEEN BENSON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders V. California cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the revocation of the Appellant’s probation and the resulting judgment and sentence. However, the order of revocation indicates that the Appellant violated conditions 1, 3, 5, 9, 11, and 15 of her probation. The transcripts of the admission colloquy indicate that the Appellant denied the two violations of condition 3, but otherwise admitted the allegations in the violation of probation affidavit. The State declined to pursue the two violations of condition 3. Therefore, we remand for the correction of the scrivener’s error in the order of revocation by removing condition 3 as one of the conditions violated. See Green v. State, 246 So. 3d 1295, 1295-96 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) (affirming the revocation of a defendant’s
probation and the resulting sentence in an Anders appeal, but remanding for the correction of a scrivener’s error in the revocation order).
RAY, C.J., and LEWIS and BILBREY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Green v. State, 246 So. 3d 1295 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)