MICHAEL BENDELL, APPELLANT,
v.
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1989-11-15
No. 89-0784
ANSTEAD and GARRETT, JJ., concur., STONE, J., dissents with opinion.
551 So. 2d 1280 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1989)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.-

PER CURIAM.-

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings in accord with Leaf v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 544 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

ANSTEAD and GARRETT, JJ., concur. STONE, J., dissents with opinion.

Dissent
STONE, Judge,

STONE, Judge,

dissenting.

In my judgment, the trial court did not err by denying attorney’s fees to the prevailing plaintiff in this action to compel arbitration. I would recede from Leaf v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 544 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989) and Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest v. Moudy, 547 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). Section 627.727(8), Florida Statutes (1987) restricts the award of fees in uninsured motorist actions to coverage disputes and circumstances where the insurer has denied coverage. Here, there is no dispute over coverage, nor has there been a denial of coverage. The sole issue to be resolved was whether the plaintiff was entitled to the resolution of his claim, brought under Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1987), by arbitration rather than litigation. Therefore, I would affirm on the authority of Lachance v. Sagumeri, 537 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 545 So. 2d 1368 (Fla. 1989).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw