FLORIDA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES COUNCIL 79, AFSCME, APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF PENSACOLA AND PENSACOLA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RELATIONS COMMISSION, APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 1989-10-05
No. 89-330
SMITH, THOMPSON and MINER, JJ., concur.
550 So. 2d 132 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1989)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Florida Public Employees Council 79 appealed dismissal of its representation petition by the Pensacola Public Employees Relations Commission (PPERC) based on lapsed employee organization registration. The court affirmed, holding that local option agencies like PPERC have authority to impose their own registration requirements under state law.


Holding

Local option agencies have authority under section 447.603 to adopt their own registration requirements and procedures. The dismissal of the representation petition was proper because appellant failed to timely comply with PPERC's registration provisions.


Headnotes

[1] Local option agencies, authorized by statute, may adopt their own registration requirements for employee organizations in lieu of state requirements, provided such provis…

[2] A representation petition filed by an employee organization may be dismissed when the organization's registration with the relevant commission has expired.

Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Any district school board or political subdivision ... may elect to adopt ... its own local option in lieu of the requirements of this part, provided such provisions and procedures thereby adopted effectively secure to public employees substantially equivalent rights and procedures as set forth in this part”

Establishes that local option agencies have authority to adopt their own registration requirements and procedures under section 447.603

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Appellant was properly registered with PPERC when it filed a representation petition. The hearing was scheduled for November 30, 1988, but appellant's…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals a final order of the Pensacola Public Employees Relations Commission dismissing its representation petition because appellant’s registration as an employee organization had expired. We affirm.

The Pensacola Public Employees Relations Commission (PPERC) is the local option agency for the City of Pensacola, as authorized by section 447.603. In the case before us, appellant was properly registered with PPERC at the time its representation petition was filed. A hearing on the petition was scheduled for November 30, 1988. However, appellant’s registration expired on November 10, 1988, and despite notice from PPERC prior to that date advising of the impending expiration, appellant did nothing to prevent the lapse of its registration. The employer on November 22, 1988, filed a motion to dismiss grounded on the lapsed registration. Appellant on November 23, 1988, filed a new Application for Registration, in a separate proceeding, which remained pending awaiting further information at the time of dismissal in this case on November 29, 1988. PPERC’s order of dismissal specifically provided that dismissal was without prejudice to refiling of appellant’s representation petition after it has complied with the registration requirements.

The appellant argues that local option agencies, such as PPERC, have no authority to adopt registration requirements of their own, but must instead defer to employee organization’s registration status with the Florida Public Employees Relation Commission. A plain reading of section 447.603 indicates otherwise. That section provides in pertinent part: Any district school board or political subdivision ... may elect to adopt ... its own local option in lieu of the requirements of this part, provided such provisions and procedures thereby adopted effectively secure to public employees substantially equivalent rights and procedures as set forth in this part... ,1

Clearly, “this part” refers to Chapter 447, Part II — “Labor Organizations, Public Employees,” which in section 447.305 sets forth procedures for registration of an employee organization. Appellant’s argument that section 447.603 allows for adoption by local option agencies only of substantive rather than procedural rules in lieu of Chapter 447 is completely without support.

Because appellant admittedly failed to timely comply with PPERC’s registration provisions, dismissal of the representation petition was proper. See North Brevard County Hospital District, Inc. v. Florida Public Employees Relations Commission, 392 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). Compare, Sanitation Employees Association, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 526 So. 2d 128 (Fla.3d DCA), rev. dismissed, 538 So. 2d 1255 (Fla.1988) (dismissal of representation petition inappropriate when a defective registration is cured with adequate notice to employees prior to election).

Accordingly, the order is AFFIRMED.

SMITH, THOMPSON and MINER, JJ., concur. . By amendment, Chapter 77, Section 343, Laws of Florida (1977), now section 447.603(5), Florida Statutes (1987), this local option provision was limited to district school boards or political subdivisions whose application for approval by the commission had been filed on or before June 1, 1977.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw