HOWARD JOHNSON COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
JACOBUS LIMAUGE AND NICOLE LIMAUGE, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1989-09-26
Nos. 88-2997, 89-280
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and JORGENSON, JJ.
549 So. 2d 1093 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review is reversed only with respect to the individual defendants H.W. Prahl, Jr. and R.A. Prahl. See McDaniel v. Sheffield, 431 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), review denied, 440 So. 2d 352 (Fla.1983). Since there is no other harmful error, the judgment against the remaining defendant-appellants is affirmed. Orlando Executive Park, Inc. v. Robbins, 433 So. 2d 491 (Fla.1983); Crinkley v. Holiday Inns, Inc., 844 F. 2d 156 (4th Cir.1988); Metropolitan Dade County v. Cox, 453 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Sears v. Southern Pac. Co., 313 F. 2d 498 (9th Cir. 1963); Walt Disney World Co. v. Wood, 515 So. 2d 198 (Fla.1987); § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1987).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw