MULTI RESTAURANT CONCEPTS, INC., GERARD J. KLAUDER, ROBERT L. NUNNO, AND KLAUDER AND NUNNO ENTERPRISES, INC., APPELLANTS,
v.
CHRYSLER CAPITAL CORPORATION, APPELLEE
MULTI RESTAURANT CONCEPTS, INC., GERARD J. KLAUDER, ROBERT L. NUNNO, AND KLAUDER AND NUNNO ENTERPRISES, INC., APPELLANTS,
CHRYSLER CAPITAL CORPORATION, APPELLEE
545 So. 2d 514
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
On this record we perceive no disputed issue of material fact as to the affirmative defenses offered by appellants, and consequently are unable to agree with appellants’ contention that triable issues of fact with respect to the affirmative defenses precluded entry of summary judgment. See Morton v. Mercantile Nat’l Bank, 185 So. 2d 172, 173 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pembroke Ctr., LLC v. State, 64 So. 3d 737 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)…ing project. Clearly, the property owner has alleged a substantial deprivation of the productive use of its property. The state alleges that its actions are merely planning activities and not actionable. In Auerbach v. Department of Transportation, 545 So. 2d 514, 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), the court found that planning activities were not actionable inasmuch as these types of administrative planning activities were “preparatory to a decision to institute eminent domain proceedings.” In the present case, the pr…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Morton v. Mercantile Nat'l Bank OF Miami Beach, 185 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)