VENANCIO NOA, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
VENANCIO NOA, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
545 So. 2d 508
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Waterhouse v. State, 429 So. 2d 301, 306 (Fla.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 977, 104 S.Ct. 415, 78 L.Ed.2d 352 (1983).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bertman v. Zfour, Inc., 661 So. 2d 423 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…o defendant Bertman’s renewing his motion to dismiss should discovery yield evidence sufficient to establish lack of personal jurisdiction over him. See Venetian Salami Co: v. Parthenais, 554 So. 2d 499 (Fla.1989); Gaines Motor Lines, Inc. v. Scott, 545 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Affirmed.…
-
Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Mengloi, 587 So. 2d 1188 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)…m, without prejudice, the trial court’s denial of appellants’, D.B. “Jim” Haseotes’, George Haseotes’, Byron Ha-seotes’ and James M. Mumma’s, motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction on the authority of Gaines Motor Lines, Inc. v. Scott, 545 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1989). We do not, however, review that part of the trial court’s order which denied appellants’ motions to dismiss based upon mis-joinder and multifariousness because this is a non-final order for which no appeal is provided under Fla.…
Authorities Cited
- Waterhouse v. State, 429 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 1983)
- Nevada v. Vine, 464 U.S. 977 (U.S. 1983)